Submission information
Submission Number: 24346
Submission ID: 74810
Submission UUID: 54c7fab7-8995-4bba-8498-98d8385f792b
Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation
Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:47
Remote IP address: (unknown)
Submitted by: admin
Language: English
Is draft: No
Current page: webform_submission_import
Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation
Locked: Yes
Contractor (PM) did produce results within a timely manner, but did not always hand in requested documents or answer emails in a timely manner. For example, the amendment docs were handed in past the due date for when we could amend work orders in FY21
Contractor (PM) did a good job at executing the scope of work and demonstrated commitment to trying to get access to all the properties needing sampling. The PM did communicate issues and hosted meetings to keep the MPCA up-to-date which was appreciated!