Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Mankato City

SWIFT Contract Number 171674

Project Name TH 169 Corridor Study

Project Number (if applicable) 1035556

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: MnDOT is looking at a project on US169 in approximately 2027. There are a number of issues along this corridor that we will
need to address with this future project. The contract allowed us to partner with MAPO (Mankato/North Mankato Area
Planning Organization) to study the corridor, identify the issues, and determine potential solutions.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 01/29/2020 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 11/30/2021 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 12/06/2021 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $67580.30

Amendments $5000.00

Contract total $72580.30

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Allis,Ronda Catherine

Evaluator Email Address ronda.allis@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor had to work through COVID restrictions and modify the work plan on the fly. They did a great job adapting to a
virtual environment. A cost recovery plan was developed early on when it was clear that some COVID impacts, as well as
partner demands, would put the contract in jeopardy of going over the contract amount.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The Contractor delivered high quality work. One of the cost recovery measures included having MAPO pull together the final
DRAFT plan. It was clear that their writing styles were different. It would have been nice if the Contractor would have been able
to develop all the deliverables, but I understand why it was necessary to farm out some of the work to keep the project within
budget.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Appropriate

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied