Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Facility Engineering Associates, P.C.

SWIFT Contract Number 156655

Project Name 20-Year Strategic Facilities Asset Management Plan

Project Number (if applicable) 1033220

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: MnDOT Office of Maintenance-Building Services needed a document that could provide a very good map for where we need to go with financing of future plans and programs, taking into account historic and current spending on capital and
maintenance. This needed to project at least 20 years, and in this case, 80 years for some of the data extrapolation. We now
have a document that informs MnDOT internally as well as legislators and the public about the building and funding needs
within the Office of Maintenance.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 04/29/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 03/31/2021 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 09/30/2021 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $293969.50

Amendments $9600.00

Contract total $303569.50

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? th

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Moates,Christopher B

Evaluator Email Address Chris.Moates@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor was timely in most things. The extension of the contract was due to coordinating with findings in our space & security contract and with making additional presentations to key audiences.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor has a history of doing very good work for the State of Minnesota and this was found to be true with this contract also. This included personnel, communication to me as PM, and deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor's cost is above average. It is entirely possible that had other bidders come forward, that cost could have enabled another qualified bidder to win the contract.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied