Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon Consultants, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 181147

Project Name FY21 Phase 16 Oversight and Corrective Action Repo

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the Contract was the coordination of the Phase XVI remediation, remedial action oversight, and corrective action report preparation. The work was necessary to minimize risks to human health and the environment from creosote impacts in soil and groundwater.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 08/24/2020 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 06/30/2021 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 03/01/2021 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $60799.85

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $36863.65

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? FY21 2801 B04311S7 B041E02

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Lee Zettler

Evaluator Email Address Lee.Zettler@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor completed the deliverables in a timely matter.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the Contractor's deliverables and services was excellent. The Contractor did an excellent job communicating to the MDA and providing recommendations for the project. The Contractor did a great job completing the Phase XVI Corrective Action Report and using GIS-based data to update the maps. The Contractor provided critical oversight and important assistance to the MDA in managing the Phase XVI Excavation. Overall, the project was done very well.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor's costs were fair and reasonable. The Contractor did a great job consolidating tasks during mobilizations to the site and utilizing appropriate level staff for the tasks, which reduced costs to the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor's overall performance on the project was excellent. The Contractor did a great job working on and coordinating multiple tasks for the contract. The Contractor was always responsive to requests and communications from the MDA, and provided professional assistance and partnership to the MDA that contributed greatly to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied