Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Terracon Consultants

SWIFT Contract Number 162123

Project Name Former Skelly Station/LS0020215

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this work order was to continue groundwater monitoring and oversee the advancement of additional soil borings to determine the extent and magnitude of contamination. Results were to be submitted in a monitoring report.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 07/18/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 06/30/2020 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2020 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $33076.89

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $33076.89

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kate Lewison

Evaluator Email Address Katherine.lewison@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfied. Contractor kept me updated regarding property access issues at this site. We were able to work together on this, and successfully obtained access to the property, which kept the site moving along. Also responded to my emails/phone calls and kept me updated on site status.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Very satisfied. Work plan and submittals were clear and complete. The goal of the contract were accomplished.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfied. Budget was well prepared and managed. A couple of incorrect invoices were submitted. However, these were quickly corrected & resubmitted for payment.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfied. This project required communication with property owners for access, and Terracon handled this well. Due to property access issues and covid-19, there was a delay in the work and the final sampling event, and therefore, the monitoring report could not be prepared. This was something that couldn’t have been reasonably anticipated and the report will be completed in FY21.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied