Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 159628

Project Name Comparison of Double Ring and Modified Phillip Dun

Project Number (if applicable) 1033136

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Testing for storm water treatment volume performance in basins that meet NPDES permit requirements is both an art and science. The current ASTM testing method is very expensive,a nd takes 6 hours to perform one test. One test does not mean an average. This contract examined a new testing apparatus that is quick, easy and low cost in comparison as equals. MnDOT does
not have the testing apparatus necessary for comparisons (always contracted to prime contractor during construction.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 06/21/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 09/30/2019 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 01/31/2020 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $49995.37

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $49995.37

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Stenlund,Dwayne Leo

Evaluator Email Address Dwayne.Stenlund@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness seemed timely to fit within a season of weather that affects ability to perform testing (cannot be too wet or dry). Source of water for performing tests can be a significant time problem between testing sets necessary for statistical comparisons between two measuring systems..

Evaluate the contractor's quality Rate exceptional. This is also due to making sure there would be implementation determination

Evaluate the contractor's cost I never know what anything should cost, but know they spent more time than compensated. I remain convinced cost was a bargain for the results obtained.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance GOOD

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied