Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Terracon Consultants

SWIFT Contract Number 162063

Project Name Polish Palace/LS0011420

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the contract was to perform additional site characterization activities including sampling of monitoring wells and select potable wells, advancing push-probes to delineate the extent of the light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) under Cable Road, and collecting aquifer data. The results of the site characterization activities were summarized in an Excavation Detailed Corrective Action Design Report (EDCAD).

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 07/17/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 06/30/2020 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2020 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $35058.42

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $35058.42

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kate Lewison

Evaluator Email Address Katherine.lewison@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Very satisfied. Terracon kept me updated on a regular basis and kept the project moving. Project manager responds to emails/phone calls in a very timely manner. We also received the EDCAD report in a timely manner.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Very satisfied. Terracon’s report was very detailed and comprehensive. They were able to effectively accomplish the goals of the contract.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Very satisfied. The budget was prepared and managed very well.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Very satisfied. Project managers have been great to work with on this project, and have been able to keep it moving toward corrective action. This has been a very challenging site due to conditions, accessibility and the need for a pending corrective action, and Terracon has managed this site well. Terracon was able to Communication and coordination with nearby property owners has also been key. We’re working toward a CA here, and throughout the process, Terracon has provided insightful proposals/options for moving forward.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied