Agency MNIT

Contractor Resource Data Inc

SWIFT Contract Number 166628

Project Name Windows Server 2008 Migration

Project Number (if applicable) JYRMXWTU

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Minnesota Board of Medical Practice's (BMP) production licensing system still resided on a Windows Server 2008 R2 in 2019. Microsoft announced the product (Windows 2008) will reach the end of support on January 14, 2020. The MNIT server team has indicated the AGENCY must move the licensing system, including all programming codes, online services, utilities, reports, and database to a new server. The project will accomplish this move. 

This project is an IT technology upgrade for the servers that host the mission critical licensing database/application for the Board regulated professional, such as physicians, physician assistants, etc.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 09/18/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 02/28/2020 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 02/28/2020 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $49920.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $49920.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Mark Chu

Evaluator Email Address mark.chu@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Project was finished on time. Contractor could meet the major project milestone deadlines. Vendor’s contractor worked part time on this project. Due to his other business engagements, sometimes he didn’t reply to emails timely

Evaluate the contractor's quality The end quality is great; all deliverables were met. When there are issues that arise, the contractor is quick resolving them. Some additional testing would be preferable before deployments.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor’s cost is reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Performance has been satisfactory. Contractor is very knowledgeable. Board of Medical Practice’s licensing system and database were able to be migrates to a new server with all requirements met.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied