Agency Corrections Dept

Contractor Klein McCarthy & Co., Ltd

SWIFT Contract Number 114296

Project Name Pre-Design for 96 Bed Housing Unit MCF-Red Wing

Project Number (if applicable) 78RW0028

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: DOC needed Pre-Designs as part of study to expand housing capacity Minnesota-wide.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 09/01/2016 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2017 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 07/24/2017 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $39850.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $39850.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? '16 Agency

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied