Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon Consultants Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 124155

Project Name Ph 13 Remediation Oversight - Kettle River Co.

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the Contract was to provide oversight of the Phase 13 soil corrective actions
(soil excavation and disposal) and monitoring well installation associated with the Kettle River Co. Creosote Plant Site in Sandstone, Minnesota. The work was necessary to minimize risks to human health and the environment from creosote impacts.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 05/02/2017 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2017 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 06/30/2017 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $46267.74

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $46267.74

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? FY17 2801 B04311S7 B041E02

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Thomas Reppe

Evaluator Email Address thomas.reppe@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor provided deliverables and services in a timely matter.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the Contractor's deliverables and services was excellent. The Contractor provided appropriate level senior and mid level staff for the project and tasks. Staff provided excellent daily communications to the MDA with updated information from the site.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor's costs were fair and reasonable. The Contractor completed the work efficiently and
with appropriate level staff.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor's overall performance on the project was excellent. The Contractor did a great job
managing and working on multiple tasks at the same time, with numerous staff. The Contractor provided the MDA with excellent communication and professional experience to manage and coordinate the site activities being conducted by the construction and well installation contractors.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied