Agency Corrections Dept

Contractor ATTIC Correctional Services

SWIFT Contract Number B56571

Project Name Second Chance Act RV Housing

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: ATTIC Correctional Services provided transitional housing units in two counties and rental subsidies for an additional two counties. It was a necessary collaborative partner in a "one-stop shop" reentry hub model used to support release violators who also had access to integrated case management, cog skills/domestic violence prevention groups, mentoring groups and employment placement and services. Temporary housing was provided to those who had no other housing options.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 06/06/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 09/30/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 12/31/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $163000

Amendments $311901.40

Contract total $522201.40

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? DOJ, BJA -2010-2456 and BJA-2011-3044

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Lee Buckley

Evaluator Email Address lee.buckley@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness ATTIC Correctional Services provided excellent and flexible services to a very hard to serve population. They were able to enhance their services to meet the needs of the clients by serving as the housing subsidy administrator.

Evaluate the contractor's quality ATTIC Correctional Services not only worked very closely and well with DOC staff but they also worked with county corrections staff in 4 counties. The housing was always safe, clean and available to those clients who needed it. The house monitors and area supervisor was always available, even during non regular business hours.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor stayed within budget. We provided additional dollars to them to administer payments to landlords for placements into permanent housing.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Exceeded our expectations.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied