Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 72231

Project Name Plymouth Truck Station Environmental Investigation

Project Number (if applicable) 5144

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Complete Subsurface Environmental Investigations related to residual petroleum contamination that was delaying construction of the Plymouth Truck Station expansion, design a soil vapor mitigation system, and oversee excavation of contaminated soil and installation of the vapor mitigation system. The goal was to limit and reduce risk associated with contaminated materials to MnDOT. The identification and remediation of known and suspected contaminated properties requires the use of specialized field equipment that the state does not own, as well as specialized OSHA safety training that most MnDOT employees do not have.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 12/06/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 09/30/2014 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 03/31/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $23782.37

Amendments $19157.81

Contract total $42940.18

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) xxxxx

Evaluator Name James DeLuca

Evaluator Email Address James.deluca@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Reports were on time and contractor was proactive.

Evaluate the contractor's quality High quality, responsive services.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Good

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor was responsive in a fast-moving and difficult job, plus provided innovative services related to the soil vapor mitigation system. Contractor was proactive during all phases of the project, and worked with the project manager to provide a mitigation system that was effective while still flexible for installation.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): xxxxx

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied