Agency Secretary of State

Contractor Simacor

SWIFT Contract Number 33108

Project Name SVRS/ERS Web Appl Specialists

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: SVRS (Statewide Voter Registration System) enhancements for a new module to allow users the ability to emulate another Jurisdiction and or see an entire Jurisdiction rather than specific information pertaining to a Municipality or School District. St. Cloud as an example is broken across three different Counties. To get a complete picture of St. Cloud a user would need to sign-on with three different user accounts. The Jurisdiction functionality allowed users to sign-on with one account but see the entire picture. Contractor also worked on Court Import module which allows real-time court case uploads from the MN Courts. Contractor also worked on Absentee Ballot enhancements.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 09/12/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 06/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $266640.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $460000.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal & General Funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Matt McCollough

Evaluator Email Address matt.mccollough@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Project scope and deliverables were completed without delays. Contractor was staff augmentation to help internal staff complete and build the new components/enhancements so they were part of the ongoing staff meetings.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Contractor performed tasks that were assigned and agreed upon by upper management and the Project Manager on the project. The work that was produced was of sound quality with only a few issues that needed further resolving.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Contractor was chosen based on a RFP process which accounted for cost to benefit ratios.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor performed all tasks that were assigned to them and the products were of sound quality. Contractor brought fresh ideas to the team and pointed out things that we could improve upon internally.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied