Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 108801

Project Name HW 65 REDUCED CONFLICT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

Project Number (if applicable) 1003039

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose was to document the state of national practice on reduced conflict intersections, to determine the ideal
intersection configuration for TH 65 at Viking Boulevard, to write a report documenting the methods and findings, and to
produce and educational video. It was necessary to enter into a contract for this because MnDOT staff did not have time
available to do all this ourselves. In addition, we wanted and benefited from the independent perspective of the contractor to
let us know if our hypothesis was correct that a reduced conflict intersection would be the best solution to address safety and
mobility needs at TH 65 and Viking Boulevard. Consultant also brought special expertise to the table in traffic modeling and
communications, and in creation of the educational video.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 04/29/2016 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2017 - 00:00

Actual end date Wed, 11/30/2016 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $60909.57

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $60909.57

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Jung,Paul Alan

Evaluator Email Address PAUL.JUNG@STATE.MN.US

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor was timely. Timely with deliverables, and timely in responding to inquiries.

Evaluate the contractor's quality We were pleased with the contractor's quality and would be happy to consider this contractor again should there be need for
similar work at other intersections or on other corridors in the future.

Evaluate the contractor's cost In my judgment, MnDOT paid a fair price and received a good value for our money. The contractor was justly compensated and
gave us every penny's worth.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Very Satisfied

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied