Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Stonebrooke Engineering Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 84917

Project Name YouTube Video: Roundabout Myths

Project Number (if applicable) xxxxx

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Modern roundabouts are a relatively new traffic control method in the State of Minnesota, and there appears to be some confusion regarding their operation and benefits. In some cases, this confusion, along with misinformation, has led to the development of ¿roundabout myths¿ that are prevalent in many public roundabout discussions, publications, and presentations. The purpose of this project is to develop and publish an informational video that identifies these roundabout myths and clears up some of the misunderstandings that exist.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 10/17/2014 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 10/31/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Sat, 10/31/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $19875.05

Amendments $0.0

Contract total $19826.44

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Local Road Research Board

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) na

Evaluator Name Sulmaan Khan

Evaluator Email Address Sulmaan.M.Khan@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The project was completed within the agreed upon timeframe. The contractor did a great job in ensuring the final product was delivered on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Overall, the contractor’s quality was high. They did a nice job with completing the tasks for the project. There were some clips from the final video which were not quality material. The contractor was informed about this and they did attempt to fix the problem but it was evident that the quality for certain clips was still substandard in the final video.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor completed the project within budget. There were no issues with cost for the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor did perform well overall. As mentioned above, there were certain portions of the final video which were not of the greatest quality but they did otherwise perform well on delivering the final product.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): na

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 3 - neutral