Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #16967

Submission information

Submission Number: 16967

Submission ID: 67431

Submission UUID: 8d772545-c785-4294-a9e1-a22bc5c49325

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:58

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: admin

Language: English

Is draft: No

Current page: webform_submission_import

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor University of Iowa

SWIFT Contract Number 89050

Project Name Developing a Roadway Salt Best Management Practice

Project Number (if applicable) 6742

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The goal of this project is to investigate and analyze issues related to deicing chemical supplies during the winter of 2013-2014. The investigation should cover the available supply of deicing chemicals with a primary focus on road salt. The project should identify where there were problems and why the problems existed. The project should investigate best practices of salt users and suppliers to develop a manual of best practices.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 02/18/2015 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 07/31/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 11/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $62500.00

Amendments $0.0

Contract total $58171.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Clear Roads Federal Funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) na

Evaluator Name Thomas Peters

Evaluator Email Address Tom.Peters@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The deliverables completed were on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Overall quality was good.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Cost appears to be in line for the required services that were being delivered.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall performance met desired expectations. Satisfactory. Amendment to extend work schedule for 4 additional months. A Final Report was completed.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): na

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied