Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor CTC & Associates LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 96188

Project Name TRS: Managing Atypical (Ancillary) Pavements

Project Number (if applicable) 1000885

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The TRS will be aimed at documenting research and best practices for management (including inventory and condition tracking) of ancillary pavements. TRS on Best Practices for Managing Atypical (Ancillary) Pavements. These are defined as pavements that are not part of main roadways; for example, shoulders, ramps, turn lanes, frontage roads, cross-over pavements, rest areas and weigh stations. MnDOT is interested in a literature search covering related federal guidelines for managing these assets (including inventory and condition tracking) and existing practices of other states, large cities and metropolitan areas, and a few international sources. MnDOT would also like a focused effort to interview up to a dozen agencies that have effective management practices for ancillary pavements. The interviews would be aimed at getting details and documentation on the practices and their effectiveness.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 07/13/2015 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 01/31/2016 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 01/15/2016 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $8759.00

Amendments $0.0

Contract total $8759.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH & Federal

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Joshua Pearson

Evaluator Email Address Joshua.Pearson@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness n/a

Evaluate the contractor's quality n/a

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor’s cost were reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor completed the TRS in a timely fashion and was flexible in adjusting to additional requests while remaining in the contract budget.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied