Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor LHB, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 78897

Project Name Bridge Rating Analysis of Local Bridges

Project Number (if applicable) 4919

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Per a directive by the Governor of the State of Minnesota, responding to a recommendation by the National Transportation Safety Board, MnDOT is proceeding with analyses of every bridge on the local State Aid roadway system to verify design and load rating capacity. The bridges on the State Aid system number in the 10,000s, and the computations for load ratings can be quite lengthy, so consultant assistance in this effort is needed on a regular basis.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 06/05/2014 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 05/31/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 05/31/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $249680.41

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $190395.90

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? STATE AID / FEDERAL

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Moises Dimaculangan

Evaluator Email Address Moises.Dimaculangan@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Deliverables were completed on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality LHB achieved desired outcomes with no problems or errors. Work met the requirements, accurate and complete

Evaluate the contractor's cost Made good faith effort to collaboratively resolve negotiation issues. Finished within budget. The contractor adhered to budget as specified in the contract/scope of work.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Submitted accurate and timely progress reports, schedules and invoices. Work was clear and met standard. The Contractor met all the specifications and requirements; acted with customers in mind; established and maintained effective relationships with customers and gained their trust and respect; goes above and beyond to anticipate customer needs and respond accordingly.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied