Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor SRF Consulting Group

SWIFT Contract Number 67677

Project Name Noise and Mobile Source Air Toxics Analysis on I-9

Project Number (if applicable) 4144

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The goal of this study is to perform separate Noise and Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) analysis to determine the impacts and mitigation for those impacts as a result of the proposed improvements on I-94. The tasks associated with this contract will be project management, noise analysis, MSAT analysis, and preparation of text to document the findings of each analysis for the inclusion into the Environmental Assessment (EA) document. It was necessary to acquire a consultant due to the timing of the project and no available staff to perform the work.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 09/30/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 06/30/2014 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $71191.20

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $71191.20

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Peter Wasko

Evaluator Email Address Peter.Wasko@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness All of the deliverables were either on time or were early compared to the schedule in the contract. The consultants staff kept me informed on timing and any issues that came up

Evaluate the contractor's quality All of the contractor deliverables were of a high quality and little rework needed. In some cases the contractor went above and beyond in the quality and assistance to the project manager and project team.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractors’ costs were fair and straight forward. I felt there was no excess time spent on tasks and they had a great team of staff on the job!

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall I was very pleased with the contractors work. In all cases they were quick to react to changes and requests from the project team.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied