Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor University of Minnesota

SWIFT Contract Number 38051

Project Name Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Syste

Project Number (if applicable) 98691

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this contract was to try and improve safety at 3 intersections with technology developed by the contractor. In order to do this MnDOT needed to enter into a contract with the contractor.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 06/27/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 06/30/2014 - 00:00

Actual end date Sat, 01/31/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $352143.25

Amendments $-16729.16

Contract total $335414.09

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) The CICAS was developed and deployed with 80% funding from the Federal Highway Administration. The project was completed through a cooperative agreement between MnDOT and FHWA which specified the University of Minnesota as the contractor for the system. The project was a logical extension of the Intersection Decision Support (IDS) project and the initial design, installation and activation of the CICAS-SSA systems was performed by the University of Minnesota.

Evaluator Name Daniel Rowe

Evaluator Email Address Daniel.rowe@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness There were times when response time to maintenance issues was less than desirable.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Contractor did quality work

Evaluate the contractor's cost Cost was reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor did quality work.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied