Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon Consultants Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 98396

Project Name FY16 Ph 11 CAR/Ph 12 Invest - Kettle River Co.

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the Contract was to prepare the Phase 11 Corrective Action Report, conduct additional soil investigation for the Phase 12 corrective actions, and collect site location information using GIS technology associated with the Kettle River Co. Creosote Plant Site in Sandstone, Minnesota. The work was necessary to minimize risks to human health and the environment.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 08/21/2015 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 06/30/2016 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 06/30/2016 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $28580.04

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $28580.04

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? FY16 2801 B04311S7 B041E02

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Thomas Reppe

Evaluator Email Address thomas.reppe@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor completed the deliverables and services in a timely matter.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the Contractor's deliverables and services was excellent. The Contractor did a great
job updating figures with GIS-based data and including information requested by the MDA. The Contractor did an excellent job communicating to the MDA and providing recommendations.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor's costs were fair and reasonable. The Contractor did a good job consolidating tasks
during mobilizations to the site to reduce costs to the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor's overall performance on the project was excellent. The Contractor did a good job
working on and coordinating multiple tasks at the same time for the project. The Contractor did a
great job updating data tables and figures with new, requested information, and providing relevant communication and recommendations to the MDA.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied