Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor AECOM

SWIFT Contract Number 63187

Project Name WORK PLAN AND COST PROPOSAL FOR MACGILLIS & GIBBS

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The MPCA has assured US EPA that O&M responsibility for the groundwater pump and treatment of PCP-impacted groundwater as part of the Long Term Response Actions at the site. This includes technical direction and financing of the remedial processes.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 07/02/2014 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $238415.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $238415.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? state

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) AECOM is familiar with the site and has had managed O&M for past years.

Evaluator Name Ed Olson

Evaluator Email Address edward.olson@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor had satisfactory schedule maintenance. All deliverables were received on time, and all invoices were submitted on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor submitted reports of satisfactory quality. One of the draft MCES qtrly report filing was reviewed and found unacceptable and needed rework before approved for filing. Overall the contractor did a satisfactory job of accomplishing the contract goals.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor did a satisfactory job of managing the budget. No invoices were submitted incorrectly. One change order was needed in order to re-allocate $5,000 from task 1 (labor) to task 4 (labor) to perform cost benefit analysis requested by MPCA. Also, needed to move $1,200 from Tsk 1 (equip) to Tsk 2 (Lab Subcont), and $3,300 from Tsk 1 (supplies) for analytical costs assoc. with GW sampling.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall the performance of the contractor was satisfactory.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 3 - neutral