Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor TechPro

SWIFT Contract Number 79178

Project Name TIS Application Developer (Architect)

Project Number (if applicable) P1666

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Develop the Traffic, Pavement History and Crash application solutions that will provide data to various customers, both internal and external to MnDOT. This is part of the TIS Mainframe Retirement initiative. The data is currently maintained on the TIS mainframe which will be retired. The Traffic data is used to perform annual adjustments factors on traffic data, create Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reports and extract historical traffic data. Pavement History data is used to evaluate investments in pavement and determine when to do various pavement repair projects, which is a critical function of MnDOT. There may be minor modifications to the Crash Application that were included under this contract too.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 07/01/2014 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 617.5

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $97000

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $59900

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TIS Modernization Budget

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) ASAP-IT contracting process was used. Because there were insufficient resources in IT to complete the needed work and in order to meet our timeline target, this was contracted out. Traffic, Pavement History and Crash data need to be migrated off the mainframe before the mainframe can be decommissioned. We needed a contracted resource for this project. A MN.IT Information Architect, DBA and MnDOT subject matter experts participated, to inform business requirements.

Evaluator Name Jocelyn Stein

Evaluator Email Address jocelyn.stein@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfied, contactor attends meetings, and meets deadlines unless delayed due to a dependency from MnDOT.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfied, contractor meets needs of customer, asks appropriate questions for clarification on requested modifications.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Very Satisfied, contract bills time as services are used and results are delivered.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfied, contractor was readily available, engaged in project discussions and solutions, and produced usable results to the customer.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): N/A

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied