Agency Administration Dept

Contractor Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.

SWIFT Contract Number 62290

Project Name MNiT Hub Room at COB

Project Number (if applicable) 02CO0006

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Design consultant required for construction bid project to consolidate and relocate the MNiT data hub to free up space for the senate Staff space which was part of the Capitol Moves projects.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 07/05/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 06/30/2105 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 06/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $56250.00

Amendments $314780.00

Contract total $380030.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? '14 Agency, '12 Bond

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Originally a SDSB selected design firm to do these projects as they came up.

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied