Agency Medical Practice Board

Contractor Lynmark Consulting Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number B50736

Project Name Participant Case Management System

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Minnesota Board of Medical Practice (BMP) refers its regulated health care professionals, who are unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety by reason of illness, use of alcohol, drugs, chemicals, or any other substances, or as a result of any mental, physical, or psychological condition, to the Health Professional Services Program.
A "Participant Case Management System" database (PCMS) is needed to monitor participant evaluation data, treatment recommendations, progress in treatment, work quality assessments, and medication management, along with documenting attendance at support groups and random drug screens, if alcohol or drug use is part of the illness. This contract was necessary to develop a database for collection and management of information needed to monitor compliance by participants with individualized participation agreements established by the Program or as directed by disciplinary orders issued by BMP.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 11/10/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 06/30/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 07/31/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 650.82

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $39000.00

Amendments $16320.00

Contract total $55320.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Special Revenue Fund

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Mark Chu

Evaluator Email Address mark.chu@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor was able to work part time through the whole project, and he could adjust his schedule to meet with BMP staff for weekly meetings. No delay occurred on deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Contractor's was knowledgeable on the programming tools and database that are used for this project. He was able to implement some business requirements in teh way that utilized technology to exceed staff's original expectations.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Reasonable and affordable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor communicated well with staff. He was able to come up with many good ideas and great interface designs to carry out the business needs. Contractor was flexible on his schedule, and able to complete all required duties in the contract.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied