Agency MNIT

Contractor Cengea Solutions Corporation / Trimble Forestry

SWIFT Contract Number 171241

Project Name Easement Database

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: To provide maintenance/support/troubleshooting services for the BWSR Easement Database

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 01/15/2020 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 01/14/2022 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 01/14/2025 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $60000

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $60000

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) The software is owned by Trimble Forestry (formerly Cengea) and is their intellectual property. Consequently, any work on the applications must be performed by Trimble Forestry, as they do not permit other vendors to work on their software.

Evaluator Name Amir Khimji

Evaluator Email Address amir.khimji@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor consistently demonstrated punctuality in meeting project deadlines. Their proactive communication about potential delays and effective coordination with other teams contributed to a smooth workflow.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor exhibited a high level of quality in their work. Deliverables consistently met or exceeded expectations, showcasing attention to detail and precision. Client feedback highlights satisfaction with the craftsmanship and the overall excellence of the completed projects. The contractor's commitment to quality standards positions them as a reliable and proficient contributor to project success.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor demonstrated cost-effectiveness in project management. Their initial estimates were accurate, and they adhered to the budget throughout the project. Any deviations were transparently communicated, allowing for informed decisions. The overall value provided aligns well with the cost, reflecting a responsible approach to financial aspects of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor exhibited commendable overall performance. They consistently met project deadlines with a focus on quality, demonstrating a strong commitment to delivering high-value results.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied