Agency Transportation Department

Contractor Kramer, Leas, DeLeo, P.C.

SWIFT Contract Number 233760

Project Name Public Land Corner Survey for State Projects (SP) 4302-97 and 4107-19

Project Number (if applicable) 1054116

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the contract is to conduct precise land surveying for public land corners and section subdivisions to facilitate
Right of Way (R/W) acquisition for State Projects (SP) 4302-97 and 4107-19. These surveys are necessary for planned roadway
improvements requiring plat acquisition for ADA-compliant sidewalk enhancements in McLeod County and urban
reconstruction in Lincoln County.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 08/04/2023 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 06/30/2024 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 06/28/2024 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $122211.50

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $122211.50

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? state funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Beier,Jordan Brian

Evaluator Email Address Jordan.B.Beier@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness While the consultant team made efforts to meet the schedule requirements outlined in the contract, there were several delays
that impacted the overall timeline. Some key deliverables were missed or delayed beyond the agreed-upon deadlines, including
the final deliverables, which were received over four months after the contract deadline.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor demonstrated a solid understanding of the project's challenges and effectively addressed key issues. Their
deliverables were professional, clear, and easy to understand. However, early in the project, some deliverables were omitted,
causing delays and requiring follow-up. Once resolved, the deliverables met the contract requirements.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The consultant team excelled in budget management, staying under budget and proactively collaborating to adjust costs when
the contract was amended to remove certain work.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied